5.  Figured out Deputy Prosecutor General in addition to counsel with the complainant further argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led into the recovery of sleeping drugs on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has been generated before the Court wherein the sleeping supplements were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected within the liver although not within the tummy. For this reason, the recovery of mentioned sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Learned Deputy Prosecutor General and also counsel for the complainant have also argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Bhoora led into the recovery of the motorcycle.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative on the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court within the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority of the parent department in the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount with the petitioner and shell out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits on the petitioner to which he is entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent can also be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment within the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that whilst the crime of murder was founded, the offender had a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case set a precedent for contemplating mitigating factors during sentencing.

The former means “guilty act” and also the latter means “guilty mind.” With the omission with the intention, the commission with the act alone isn't sufficient to gain a conviction for that crime. This is a primary principle that all legislation students are well acquainted with.

The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive piece of legislation that defines various criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for all those found guilty.

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to really make it ideal into the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the read more appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified with the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

only within the ground of miscases remanded & only over the ground of misreading of evidence only around the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

six.  Mere involvement in a heinous offence is no ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled to the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, due to the fact then He's behind the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is not any more demanded for further investigation, therefore, his steady incarceration would not serve any useful purpose at this stage.

On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf on the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and also the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court to get a dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all acting in their Careers with DCFS.

All bankruptcy courts have a telephone information system, also known as the Voice Case Information System, that enables callers to obtain essential case information through a touchtone phone. This is free to employ and offered 24 hrs every day.

The DCFS social worker in charge in the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report towards the court, the worker elaborated to the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

In order to prove murder, there has to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.

share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property also can sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or perhaps to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were informed with the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Risk-free with him in their home. The therapist assured them that that they had very little to worry about.